Compare to
Discover how Anthropic's Claude 3.5 Haiku and DeepSeek's DeepSeek R1 stack up against each other in this comprehensive comparison of two leading AI
language models.
Released in October 2024 and January 2025 respectively, these models represent significant advancements in artificial intelligence,
with Claude 3.5 Haiku offering a 200,000-token context
window and DeepSeek R1 featuring a 64,000-token
capacity. Their distinct approaches to natural language processing are reflected in their
benchmark performances, with Claude 3.5 Haiku achieving null% on MMLU and DeepSeek R1 scoring 90.8%, making this comparison essential
for developers and organizations seeking the right AI solution for their specific needs.
Models Overview
 Claude 3.5 Haiku |  DeepSeek R1 | |
|---|---|---|
Provider Company that developed the model | Anthropic | DeepSeek |
Context Length Maximum number of tokens the model can process | 200K | 64K |
Maximum Output Maximum number of tokens the model can generate in a single response | 8192 | 8192 |
Release Date Date when the model was released | 22-10-2024 | 20-01-2025 |
Knowledge Cutoff Training data cutoff date | April 2024 | July 2024 |
Open Source Whether the model's code is open-source | FALSE | TRUE |
API Providers API providers that offer access to the model | Anthropic API, Vertex AI, AWS Bedrock | DeepSeek, Fireworks AI, Hyperbolic |
Pricing Comparison
Compare the pricing of Anthropic's Claude 3.5 Haiku and DeepSeek's DeepSeek R1 to determine the most cost-effective solution for your AI needs.
| Claude 3.5 Haiku | DeepSeek R1 | |
|---|---|---|
Input Cost Cost per million input tokens | $0.8 / 1M tokens | $0.55 / 1M tokens |
Output Cost Cost per million tokens generated | $4 / 1M tokens | $2.19 / 1M tokens |
Comparing Benchmarks and Performance
Compare the performances of Anthropic's Claude 3.5 Haiku and DeepSeek's DeepSeek R1 on industry benchmarks. This section provides a detailed comparison on MMLU, MMMU, HumanEval, MATH and other key benchmarks.
| Claude 3.5 Haiku | DeepSeek R1 | |
|---|---|---|
MMLU Evaluating LLM knowledge acquisition in zero-shot and few-shot settings. | Benchmark not available | 90.8% |
MMMU A wide ranging multi-discipline and multimodal benchmark. | Benchmark not available | Benchmark not available |
HellaSwag A challenging sentence completion benchmark. | Benchmark not available | Benchmark not available |
GSM8K Grade-school math problems benchmark. | Benchmark not available | Benchmark not available |
HumanEval A benchmark to measure functional correctness for synthesizing programs from docstrings. | 88.1% | Benchmark not available |
MATH Benchmark performance on Math problems ranging across 5 levels of difficulty and 7 sub-disciplines. | 69.4% | 97.2% |
