Compare to

Discover how DeepSeek's DeepSeek R1 and Meta's Llama 4 Scout stack up against each other in this comprehensive comparison of two leading AI language models.

Released in January 2024 and April 2025 respectively, these models represent significant advancements in artificial intelligence, with DeepSeek R1 offering a 64,000-token context window and Llama 4 Scout featuring a 10,000,000-token capacity. Their distinct approaches to natural language processing are reflected in their benchmark performances, with DeepSeek R1 achieving 90.8% on MMLU and Llama 4 Scout scoring Unknown%, making this comparison essential for developers and organizations seeking the right AI solution for their specific needs.

Models Overview

DeepSeek DeepSeek R1
DeepSeek Llama 4 Scout

Provider

Company that developed the model
DeepSeek Meta

Context Length

Maximum number of tokens the model can process
64K 10M

Maximum Output

Maximum number of tokens the model can generate in a single response
8192 Unknown

Release Date

Date when the model was released
20-01-2024 05-04-2025

Knowledge Cutoff

Training data cutoff date
July 2024 August 2024

Open Source

Whether the model's code is open-source
TRUE TRUE

API Providers

API providers that offer access to the model
DeepSeek, Fireworks AI, Hyperbolic Azure AI, AWS Bedrock, Vertex AI, NVIDIA NIM, IBM watsonx, Hugging Face

Pricing Comparison

Compare the pricing of DeepSeek's DeepSeek R1 and Meta's Llama 4 Scout to determine the most cost-effective solution for your AI needs.

DeepSeek DeepSeek R1
DeepSeek Llama 4 Scout

Input Cost

Cost per million input tokens
$0.55 / 1M tokens Pricing not available

Output Cost

Cost per million tokens generated
$2.19 / 1M tokens Pricing not available

Comparing Benchmarks and Performance

Compare the performances of DeepSeek's DeepSeek R1 and Meta's Llama 4 Scout on industry benchmarks. This section provides a detailed comparison on MMLU, MMMU, HumanEval, MATH and other key benchmarks.

DeepSeek DeepSeek R1
DeepSeek Llama 4 Scout

MMLU

Evaluating LLM knowledge acquisition in zero-shot and few-shot settings.
90.8% Benchmark not available

MMMU

A wide ranging multi-discipline and multimodal benchmark.
Benchmark not available 69.4%

HellaSwag

A challenging sentence completion benchmark.
Benchmark not available Benchmark not available

GSM8K

Grade-school math problems benchmark.
Benchmark not available Benchmark not available

HumanEval

A benchmark to measure functional correctness for synthesizing programs from docstrings.
Benchmark not available Benchmark not available

MATH

Benchmark performance on Math problems ranging across 5 levels of difficulty and 7 sub-disciplines.
97.3% Benchmark not available

Compare More Models