Compare to

Discover how Google's Gemini 2.5 Pro and Open AI's o1 Mini stack up against each other in this comprehensive comparison of two leading AI language models.

Released in March 2025 and September 2024 respectively, these models represent significant advancements in artificial intelligence, with Gemini 2.5 Pro offering a 1,000,000-token context window and o1 Mini featuring a 128,000-token capacity. Their distinct approaches to natural language processing are reflected in their benchmark performances, with Gemini 2.5 Pro achieving 81.7% on MMLU and o1 Mini scoring 85.2%, making this comparison essential for developers and organizations seeking the right AI solution for their specific needs.

Models Overview

Google Gemini 2.5 Pro
Google o1 Mini

Provider

Company that developed the model
Google Open AI

Context Length

Maximum number of tokens the model can process
1M 128K

Maximum Output

Maximum number of tokens the model can generate in a single response
64K 65.54K

Release Date

Date when the model was released
25-03-2025 12-09-2024

Knowledge Cutoff

Training data cutoff date
January 2025 October 2023

Open Source

Whether the model's code is open-source
FALSE FALSE

API Providers

API providers that offer access to the model
Vertex AI OpenAI API

Pricing Comparison

Compare the pricing of Google's Gemini 2.5 Pro and Open AI's o1 Mini to determine the most cost-effective solution for your AI needs.

Google Gemini 2.5 Pro
Google o1 Mini

Input Cost

Cost per million input tokens
$1.25 / 1M tokens $1.1 / 1M tokens

Output Cost

Cost per million tokens generated
$10 / 1M tokens $0.55 / 1M tokens

Comparing Benchmarks and Performance

Compare the performances of Google's Gemini 2.5 Pro and Open AI's o1 Mini on industry benchmarks. This section provides a detailed comparison on MMLU, MMMU, HumanEval, MATH and other key benchmarks.

Google Gemini 2.5 Pro
Google o1 Mini

MMLU

Evaluating LLM knowledge acquisition in zero-shot and few-shot settings.
81.7% 85.2%

MMMU

A wide ranging multi-discipline and multimodal benchmark.
Benchmark not available Benchmark not available

HellaSwag

A challenging sentence completion benchmark.
Benchmark not available Benchmark not available

GSM8K

Grade-school math problems benchmark.
Benchmark not available Benchmark not available

HumanEval

A benchmark to measure functional correctness for synthesizing programs from docstrings.
Benchmark not available 92.4%

MATH

Benchmark performance on Math problems ranging across 5 levels of difficulty and 7 sub-disciplines.
Benchmark not available 90%

Compare More Models