Compare to

Discover how Google's Gemini Flash and Meta's Llama 3.1 70B Instruct stack up against each other in this comprehensive comparison of two leading AI language models.

Released in May 2023 and July 2024 respectively, these models represent significant advancements in artificial intelligence, with Gemini Flash offering a 1,000,000-token context window and Llama 3.1 70B Instruct featuring a 128,000-token capacity. Their distinct approaches to natural language processing are reflected in their benchmark performances, with Gemini Flash achieving 78.9% on MMLU and Llama 3.1 70B Instruct scoring 83.6%, making this comparison essential for developers and organizations seeking the right AI solution for their specific needs.

Models Overview

Google Gemini Flash
Google Llama 3.1 70B Instruct

Provider

Company that developed the model
Google Meta

Context Length

Maximum number of tokens the model can process
1M 128K

Maximum Output

Maximum number of tokens the model can generate in a single response
8192 2048

Release Date

Date when the model was released
14-05-2023 23-07-2024

Knowledge Cutoff

Training data cutoff date
November 2023 December 2023

Open Source

Whether the model's code is open-source
FALSE TRUE

API Providers

API providers that offer access to the model
Vertex AI Azure AI, AWS Bedrock, Vertex AI, NVIDIA NIM, IBM watsonx, Hugging Face

Pricing Comparison

Compare the pricing of Google's Gemini Flash and Meta's Llama 3.1 70B Instruct to determine the most cost-effective solution for your AI needs.

Google Gemini Flash
Google Llama 3.1 70B Instruct

Input Cost

Cost per million input tokens
$0.13 / 1M tokens Pricing not available

Output Cost

Cost per million tokens generated
$0.38 / 1M tokens Pricing not available

Comparing Benchmarks and Performance

Compare the performances of Google's Gemini Flash and Meta's Llama 3.1 70B Instruct on industry benchmarks. This section provides a detailed comparison on MMLU, MMMU, HumanEval, MATH and other key benchmarks.

Google Gemini Flash
Google Llama 3.1 70B Instruct

MMLU

Evaluating LLM knowledge acquisition in zero-shot and few-shot settings.
78.9% 83.6%

MMMU

A wide ranging multi-discipline and multimodal benchmark.
56.1% Benchmark not available

HellaSwag

A challenging sentence completion benchmark.
86.5% Benchmark not available

GSM8K

Grade-school math problems benchmark.
86.2% 95.1%

HumanEval

A benchmark to measure functional correctness for synthesizing programs from docstrings.
74.3% 80.5%

MATH

Benchmark performance on Math problems ranging across 5 levels of difficulty and 7 sub-disciplines.
54.9% 68%

Compare More Models