Compare to
Discover how Google's Gemma 2 2B and Open AI's GPT-4 stack up against each other in this comprehensive comparison of two leading AI
language models.
Released in June 2024 and March 2023 respectively, these models represent significant advancements in artificial intelligence,
with Gemma 2 2B offering a 8,192-token context
window and GPT-4 featuring a 8,192-token
capacity. Their distinct approaches to natural language processing are reflected in their
benchmark performances, with Gemma 2 2B achieving 51.3% on MMLU and GPT-4 scoring 86.4%, making this comparison essential
for developers and organizations seeking the right AI solution for their specific needs.
Models Overview
 Gemma 2 2B |  GPT-4 | |
|---|---|---|
Provider Company that developed the model | Open AI | |
Context Length Maximum number of tokens the model can process | undefined | undefined |
Maximum Output Maximum number of tokens the model can generate in a single response | Unknown | 8192 |
Release Date Date when the model was released | 27-06-2024 | 14-03-2023 |
Knowledge Cutoff Training data cutoff date | Unknown | September 2021 |
Open Source Whether the model's code is open-source | TRUE | FALSE |
API Providers API providers that offer access to the model | Hugging Face, Vertex AI | OpenAI API |
Pricing Comparison
Compare the pricing of Google's Gemma 2 2B and Open AI's GPT-4 to determine the most cost-effective solution for your AI needs.
| Gemma 2 2B | GPT-4 | |
|---|---|---|
Input Cost Cost per million input tokens | Pricing not available | $30 / 1M tokens |
Output Cost Cost per million tokens generated | Pricing not available | $60 / 1M tokens |
Comparing Benchmarks and Performance
Compare the performances of Google's Gemma 2 2B and Open AI's GPT-4 on industry benchmarks. This section provides a detailed comparison on MMLU, MMMU, HumanEval, MATH and other key benchmarks.
| Gemma 2 2B | GPT-4 | |
|---|---|---|
MMLU Evaluating LLM knowledge acquisition in zero-shot and few-shot settings. | 51.3% | 86.4% |
MMMU A wide ranging multi-discipline and multimodal benchmark. | Benchmark not available | 34.9% |
HellaSwag A challenging sentence completion benchmark. | 73% | 95.3% |
GSM8K Grade-school math problems benchmark. | 23.9% | 92% |
HumanEval A benchmark to measure functional correctness for synthesizing programs from docstrings. | 17.7% | 67% |
MATH Benchmark performance on Math problems ranging across 5 levels of difficulty and 7 sub-disciplines. | 15% | Benchmark not available |
