Compare to

Discover how Open AI's GPT-4.1 and Google's Gemini 2.5 Pro stack up against each other in this comprehensive comparison of two leading AI language models.

Released in April 2025 and March 2025 respectively, these models represent significant advancements in artificial intelligence, with GPT-4.1 offering a 1,000,000-token context window and Gemini 2.5 Pro featuring a 1,000,000-token capacity. Their distinct approaches to natural language processing are reflected in their benchmark performances, with GPT-4.1 achieving null% on MMLU and Gemini 2.5 Pro scoring 81.7%, making this comparison essential for developers and organizations seeking the right AI solution for their specific needs.

Models Overview

Open AI GPT-4.1
Open AI Gemini 2.5 Pro

Provider

Company that developed the model
Open AI Google

Context Length

Maximum number of tokens the model can process
1M 1M

Maximum Output

Maximum number of tokens the model can generate in a single response
32K 64K

Release Date

Date when the model was released
14-04-2025 25-03-2025

Knowledge Cutoff

Training data cutoff date
June 2024 January 2025

Open Source

Whether the model's code is open-source
FALSE FALSE

API Providers

API providers that offer access to the model
OpenAI API Vertex AI

Pricing Comparison

Compare the pricing of Open AI's GPT-4.1 and Google's Gemini 2.5 Pro to determine the most cost-effective solution for your AI needs.

Open AI GPT-4.1
Open AI Gemini 2.5 Pro

Input Cost

Cost per million input tokens
$2 / 1M tokens $1.25 / 1M tokens

Output Cost

Cost per million tokens generated
$8 / 1M tokens $10 / 1M tokens

Comparing Benchmarks and Performance

Compare the performances of Open AI's GPT-4.1 and Google's Gemini 2.5 Pro on industry benchmarks. This section provides a detailed comparison on MMLU, MMMU, HumanEval, MATH and other key benchmarks.

Open AI GPT-4.1
Open AI Gemini 2.5 Pro

MMLU

Evaluating LLM knowledge acquisition in zero-shot and few-shot settings.
Benchmark not available 81.7%

MMMU

A wide ranging multi-discipline and multimodal benchmark.
75% Benchmark not available

HellaSwag

A challenging sentence completion benchmark.
Benchmark not available Benchmark not available

GSM8K

Grade-school math problems benchmark.
Benchmark not available Benchmark not available

HumanEval

A benchmark to measure functional correctness for synthesizing programs from docstrings.
Benchmark not available Benchmark not available

MATH

Benchmark performance on Math problems ranging across 5 levels of difficulty and 7 sub-disciplines.
Benchmark not available Benchmark not available

Compare More Models