Compare to

Discover how Meta's Llama 3.2 3B and Anthropic's Claude 3.7 Sonnet stack up against each other in this comprehensive comparison of two leading AI language models.

Released in September 2024 and February 2025 respectively, these models represent significant advancements in artificial intelligence, with Llama 3.2 3B offering a 128,000-token context window and Claude 3.7 Sonnet featuring a 200,000-token capacity. Their distinct approaches to natural language processing are reflected in their benchmark performances, with Llama 3.2 3B achieving 63.4% on MMLU and Claude 3.7 Sonnet scoring Unknown%, making this comparison essential for developers and organizations seeking the right AI solution for their specific needs.

Models Overview

Meta Llama 3.2 3B
Meta Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Provider

Company that developed the model
Meta Anthropic

Context Length

Maximum number of tokens the model can process
128K 200K

Maximum Output

Maximum number of tokens the model can generate in a single response
Unknown 64K

Release Date

Date when the model was released
25-09-2024 25-02-2025

Knowledge Cutoff

Training data cutoff date
December 2023 October 2024

Open Source

Whether the model's code is open-source
TRUE FALSE

API Providers

API providers that offer access to the model
Azure AI, AWS Bedrock, Vertex AI, NVIDIA NIM, IBM watsonx, Hugging Face Anthropic API, Vertex AI, AWS Bedrock

Pricing Comparison

Compare the pricing of Meta's Llama 3.2 3B and Anthropic's Claude 3.7 Sonnet to determine the most cost-effective solution for your AI needs.

Meta Llama 3.2 3B
Meta Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Input Cost

Cost per million input tokens
Pricing not available $3 / 1M tokens

Output Cost

Cost per million tokens generated
Pricing not available $15 / 1M tokens

Comparing Benchmarks and Performance

Compare the performances of Meta's Llama 3.2 3B and Anthropic's Claude 3.7 Sonnet on industry benchmarks. This section provides a detailed comparison on MMLU, MMMU, HumanEval, MATH and other key benchmarks.

Meta Llama 3.2 3B
Meta Claude 3.7 Sonnet

MMLU

Evaluating LLM knowledge acquisition in zero-shot and few-shot settings.
63.4% Benchmark not available

MMMU

A wide ranging multi-discipline and multimodal benchmark.
Benchmark not available 75%

HellaSwag

A challenging sentence completion benchmark.
69.8% Benchmark not available

GSM8K

Grade-school math problems benchmark.
77.7% Benchmark not available

HumanEval

A benchmark to measure functional correctness for synthesizing programs from docstrings.
Benchmark not available Benchmark not available

MATH

Benchmark performance on Math problems ranging across 5 levels of difficulty and 7 sub-disciplines.
48% 96.2%

Compare More Models