Compare to

Discover how Mistral's Mistral Large 2 and Open AI's GPT-3.5 Turbo stack up against each other in this comprehensive comparison of two leading AI language models.

Released in July 2024 and November 2022 respectively, these models represent significant advancements in artificial intelligence, with Mistral Large 2 offering a 128,000-token context window and GPT-3.5 Turbo featuring a 16,385-token capacity. Their distinct approaches to natural language processing are reflected in their benchmark performances, with Mistral Large 2 achieving 84% on MMLU and GPT-3.5 Turbo scoring 70%, making this comparison essential for developers and organizations seeking the right AI solution for their specific needs.

Models Overview

Mistral Mistral Large 2
Mistral GPT-3.5 Turbo

Provider

Company that developed the model
Mistral Open AI

Context Length

Maximum number of tokens the model can process
128K 16.39K

Maximum Output

Maximum number of tokens the model can generate in a single response
8192 4096

Release Date

Date when the model was released
24-07-2024 28-11-2022

Knowledge Cutoff

Training data cutoff date
Unknown September 2021

Open Source

Whether the model's code is open-source
TRUE FALSE

API Providers

API providers that offer access to the model
Azure AI, AWS Bedrock, Google Cloud Vertex AI Model Garden, Snowflake Cortex, Hugging Face OpenAI API

Pricing Comparison

Compare the pricing of Mistral's Mistral Large 2 and Open AI's GPT-3.5 Turbo to determine the most cost-effective solution for your AI needs.

Mistral Mistral Large 2
Mistral GPT-3.5 Turbo

Input Cost

Cost per million input tokens
$3 / 1M tokens $0.5 / 1M tokens

Output Cost

Cost per million tokens generated
$9 / 1M tokens $1.5 / 1M tokens

Comparing Benchmarks and Performance

Compare the performances of Mistral's Mistral Large 2 and Open AI's GPT-3.5 Turbo on industry benchmarks. This section provides a detailed comparison on MMLU, MMMU, HumanEval, MATH and other key benchmarks.

Mistral Mistral Large 2
Mistral GPT-3.5 Turbo

MMLU

Evaluating LLM knowledge acquisition in zero-shot and few-shot settings.
84% 70%

MMMU

A wide ranging multi-discipline and multimodal benchmark.
Benchmark not available Benchmark not available

HellaSwag

A challenging sentence completion benchmark.
85% 85.5%

GSM8K

Grade-school math problems benchmark.
Benchmark not available Benchmark not available

HumanEval

A benchmark to measure functional correctness for synthesizing programs from docstrings.
87% Benchmark not available

MATH

Benchmark performance on Math problems ranging across 5 levels of difficulty and 7 sub-disciplines.
72% 43.1%

Compare More Models